Explain the difference between job enrichment, job enlargement, and job rotation and their HR significance.

• A. Job enrichment adds more tasks at the same level.
• B. Job rotation adds meaningful tasks and autonomy.
• C. Job enrichment adds meaningful tasks and autonomy; job enlargement adds more tasks at the same level; job rotation moves employees through different roles.
• D. Job rotation eliminates repetitive tasks.

Answer: (C)

The core idea is how different ways of designing jobs affect motivation, development, and organizational flexibility. Job enrichment deepens a role by adding meaningful tasks and giving more autonomy and responsibility. When people have control over how they do work and can see the impact of their efforts, they’re often more engaged, creative, and committed, which translates into better performance and retention when supported properly.

Job enlargement broadens the work by adding more tasks at the same level of responsibility. It increases the scope of the job to reduce monotony, but without granting more authority or decision-making power, the motivational impact may be limited. It helps with variety and workload distribution but doesn’t inherently boost intrinsic motivation.

Job rotation moves employees through different roles or departments, exposing them to a range of tasks and settings. This builds broader skills, aids succession planning, and creates workforce versatility, though it can temporarily reduce efficiency during transitions and requires effective training.

So the best summary is that enrichment adds meaningful tasks and autonomy; enlargement adds more tasks at the same level; rotation shifts employees through different roles. This distinction helps HR design strategies for motivation, development, and staffing flexibility.